This page demonstrate that the rigth of defense is negate to me also in a
trial for a flat. In fact I call Scalfaro as responsible for my
impossibility to pay, as I am persecuted by Him and His Mafia. Scalfaro and
Prodi know about the appeal I made in 1996 to squash elections. I can
demonstrate it with documents. Scalfaro made a violation of Constitution to give
advance in electoral competition to his Mafia, so that to get the power in E.U. also.
In 1996 Prodi take in the hand an appeal I made for "Italia Concreta", and
He put himself as his "impartial" judge in the appeal.
In 1997 Scalfaro declare "not possible" the appeal, granted instead by
European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental freedom signed at Rome
(ha, � ha!) in 1957, also art.F.2 of the Maastricth Treaty.
So, Scalfaro saw the appeal in 1997, He know about Golpe (He made it).
After the march 1997 Scalfaro try in any way to "reform" Italia
Constitution. Do You really think the "reform" of European Union have a
rigth leader in Prodi or are You ratifying the government of Mafia in the
world?
Here documents that show I call Scalfaro as responsible in the trial,
simply they negate me any rigth of defense.
The transcription of trial "discussion" of 01 dec. 1998 first part of 2.
---------------
Sentence to "go out of flat" made without the inclusion of documents.
---------------
Appeal for an "advocate" for poor with auto certification.
---------------
Certificate of Family (I live alone).
---------------
Document of the trial to the trial for "advocate" for poor.
---------------
They refuse the advocate for poor "because I' didn't show to win that trial".
Here You can read that I ask "rigth of defense" asking for application of
two law "L.n.881/77" and "L.n.848/55".The laws are the ratification by
Italy of the 2 most important international law on Human Rights applied
in Europe (not for me), that is the U.N."Pact on human Rigth e Civil
liberty" and the pact of European Consilium on fundamental rights
ratified also by E.U. at art.F.2 of the Maastricth Treaty.
Appeal of 24 feb '99 to the judge to have "rigth of defense".
---------------
Deny of "rigth of defense" .
---------------
Order to "go out of flat " part 1 of 2.